Alert Icon ALERT
Ok Icon
FullSpecs.net Logo
 
Audio Technica ATH-S300
Rs.2,879.00

Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones
Rs.2,999.00
Brand
Audio Technica
Skullcandy
Model No
ATH-S300
Riff On-Ear Headphones
Wired / Wireless
Wired Headphone Specification
Wired Headphone Specification
Headphone Type
On Ear
On Ear
 
Magnet Type
Neodymium
Dynamic
Driver Diameter
40 mm
40 mm
Impedance
48 ohms
32 Ohm
Sensitivity
103 dB
98dB
Frequency Response
10 - 24,000Hz
20 Hz - 20000 Hz
Maximum Power Input
500 mW
1 mW
Noise Cancelling
No
NA
 
Available Colors
Black, Blue, Green
Black, White, Blue, Red, Green, Grey
Connector Plating
L-Shaped 3.5 mm Gold Plated Plug
3.5 mm
Cable
1.2 m
Tangle Resistant Cable
Weight
140 g
151 gm
Other Features
- Longtime Listening Comfort Fine 
- Fit Earpads, Minimize Sound Leakage, Powerful Sound with Deep Bass Response
- Minimizes Uncomfortable Pulling and Tangling of Headphone Cable 
- Bold Street Concept Design and Color 
- Swivel Folding for Easy Portability
Refined Acoustics.
Built-in Microphone.
Call and Track Control.
Ultra-Durable Headband.
Lightweight and Comfortable.
Collapsible, Flat-Folding Design

Compare Audio Technica ATH-S300 with:

Compare Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones with:

Key Differences

Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. Impedance levels vary (48 ohms vs 32 Ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. If you're comparing Audio Technica ATH-S300 and Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. Audio Technica ATH-S300 and Skullcandy Riff On-Ear Headphones offer different noise cancellation capabilities (No vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. There is a noticeable difference in weight (140 g vs 151 gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. Both headphones are equipped with capable drivers that deliver balanced sound output suitable for music, calls, and entertainment. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. The frequency response differs (10 - 24,000Hz vs 20 Hz - 20000 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs.

Verdict: Both headphones offer strong performance, and the right choice depends on your priorities such as battery life, comfort, and noise cancellation.

Top Differences

  • Noise Cancelling: No vs NA
  • Weight: 140 g vs 151 gm
  • Impedance: 48 ohms vs 32 Ohm