Beyerdynamic DT 287 PV MK II vs SHURE SRH1440 – Which One Should You Buy? (2026)

Made in Germany. More flexible, swivelling gooseneck for optimum positioning. Single-ear headset with condenser microphone for moderation ( closed ). High-quality condenser microphone capsule with cardioid characteristic (very high feedback prevention) (250 ohms). High-performance neodymium magnet system for excellent playback precision, very good low-frequency response. All versions of the DT 280 are supplied without a connection cable. Please order the desired connection cable at the same time.

Individually tested and serialized. Open back circumaural design promotes natural audio response. Legendary Shure durability withstands the rigors of everyday use. Impedance optimised for connectivity to most portable audio devices. Replaceable velour ear pads with high density, slow recovery foam for exceptional comfort. Open-back, circumaural design for exceptionally natural sound, wide stereo image, and increased depth of field. Fully adjustable, premium padded headband with steel frame and sleek, ergonomic design for hours of listening comfort. Additional oxygen-free copper cable and zippered storage case provide years of listening enjoyment and convenient storage. Dual-exit cables with gold-plated MMCX connectors provide secure connection and detachability for easy storage or replacement.

Key Differences

Beyerdynamic DT 287 PV MK II and SHURE SRH1440 offer different noise cancellation capabilities (NA vs CVC), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. The frequency response differs (10 - 30.000 Hz vs 15 Hz - 27000 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. The driver size differs between the two (NA vs 40 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. If you're comparing Beyerdynamic DT 287 PV MK II and SHURE SRH1440, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. There is a noticeable difference in weight (240 g vs 343 Gm), which may affect comfort during extended use. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. Impedance levels vary (250 ohm vs 37 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices.

Verdict: Both headphones offer strong performance, and the right choice depends on your priorities such as battery life, comfort, and noise cancellation.

Top Differences

Noise Cancelling: NA vs CVC
Driver Size: NA vs 40 mm
Weight: 240 g vs 343 Gm
Impedance: 250 ohm vs 37 ohm

Compare Beyerdynamic DT 287 PV MK II with:

Compare SHURE SRH1440 with:

Key Differences

Top Differences