Alert Icon ALERT
Ok Icon
FullSpecs.net Logo
 
Denon AH-C260R
Rs.850.00

JBL Tempo In-Ear J01U
Rs.899.00
Brand
Denon
JBL
Model No
AH-C260R
Tempo In-Ear J01U
Wired / Wireless
Earphone Specification
Earphone Specification
Headphone Type
In Ear Canal
In Ear Canal
 
Magnet Type
Neodymium
NA
Driver Diameter
9 mm
9 mm
Impedance
16 Ohms
16 ohms
Sensitivity
103 dB/mW
96 dB
Frequency Response
20 Hz-23,000 Hz
20 - 20,000 Hz
Maximum Power Input
1000 mW
10 mW
Noise Cancelling
NA
No
 
Available Colors
Black
Blue
Connector Plating
3.5 mm Gold Plated Jack
3.5 mm Gold Plated Plug
Cable
1.3 m
1.2 m
Weight
2.2 g
NA
Other Features
- 3-button Remote + Mic + volume with the + and – buttons
- Radial Cascade Damper reduces cable transmitted vibration noise
- Acoustic Optimiser achieves optimum acoustic characteristics by adjusting the sound pressure balance in front of and behind the diaphragm
- Hybrid material driver housing for highest fidelity sound reproduction
- Ergonomic design, for a snug fit in the ear and comfortable wearing
- Dynamic sound from 9 mm Neodymium magnet driver units
- Canal-type in-ear headphone reduces external noise and lets listeners enjoy the music
- Comes with cable clip to keep the cable from tangling or fluttering in the wind
- Exceptional bass and smooth vocals
- Latex-free silicone sleeves

Compare Denon AH-C260R with:

Compare JBL Tempo In-Ear J01U with:

Key Differences

Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. JBL Tempo In-Ear J01U and Denon AH-C260R offer different noise cancellation capabilities (No vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. If you're comparing JBL Tempo In-Ear J01U and Denon AH-C260R, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. Impedance levels vary (16 ohms vs 16 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Both headphones are equipped with capable drivers that deliver balanced sound output suitable for music, calls, and entertainment. The frequency response differs (20 - 20,000 Hz vs 20 Hz-23,000 Hz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. There is a noticeable difference in weight (NA vs 2.2 g), which may affect comfort during extended use.

Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.

Top Differences

  • Noise Cancelling: No vs NA
  • Weight: NA vs 2.2 g