| Model No |
24LF454A |
L24FBC |
| TV Type |
LED TV |
LED TV |
| Screen Size |
24 Inch (59.80 cm) |
24 Inch (59.80 cm) |
| Resolution |
1366 x 768 |
1920 x 1080 |
| Aspect Ratio |
16:9 |
16:9 |
| Motion Rate |
NA |
60 Hz |
| Viewing Angle |
178° |
178/178 |
| USB |
| USB Version |
: 2.0 |
| Supported Audio Formats |
: MP3, AAC, WMA, PCM |
| Supported Video Formats |
: MKV, DivX, MP4, AVI, ASF, MOV, FLV, DAT, VOB |
| Supported Picture Formats |
: JPG |
|
| USB Version |
: 2.0 |
| Supported Audio Formats |
: MP3, AAC, WMA, PCM |
| Supported Video Formats |
: MKV, DivX, MP4, AVI, ASF, MOV, FLV, DAT, VOB |
| Supported Picture Formats |
: JPG |
|
| Video |
| Dynamic Color Enhancer |
: Yes |
| Dynamic Clear White |
: Yes |
| Picture Mode |
: 5 modes (Vivid, Standard, Cinema, Cricket, Game) |
| Active Noise Reduction |
: Yes |
| IPS Panel |
: Yes |
| Triple XD Engine |
: Yes |
|
| Contrast Ratio |
: Dynamic |
| Response Time (ms) |
: 9 |
| Brightness |
: 250 |
| Panel Type |
: Full HD |
| Video Signal |
: 480i / 480p / 576i / 576p / 1080i / 1080p |
|
| Audio |
| Dolby Digital Decoder |
: Yes |
| Speaker System |
: 2 Ch. Speaker system |
| Audio Output (RMS) |
: 10 watts |
| Sound Mode |
: 5 Modes (Standard, Music, Cinema, Cricket, Game) |
| BollyWood Mode |
: Yes |
| Sound Optimizer |
: 3 modes (Off, Stand Type,Wall-mounted Type) |
| Audio Codec |
: AC3(Dolby Digital), AAC, Mpeg, MP3, PCM |
|
| Sound Output |
: 2 x 5 W |
| Sound Effect System |
: Stereo |
| Auto Volume Leveller |
: Yes |
|
| Connectivity Options |
| USB |
: 1 (Side) |
| HDMI |
: 1 (Rear) |
| Headphone/RCA analog out |
: 1 (RCA Analog audio out) |
| RF In |
: 1 (Rear) |
| Component In (Y,Pb,Pr + Audio) |
: 1 |
| RGB In (D-sub 15pin) - PC |
: 1 |
|
| USB 2.0 |
: 1 |
| HDMI |
: 1 |
| VGA Input |
: 1 |
| PC Audio IN |
: 1 |
| AV In |
: 1 |
| Component IN (DVD/ Bluray) |
: 1 |
| Headphone |
: 1 |
|
| Other Features |
| Motion Eco Sensor |
: Yes |
| Smart Energy Saving |
: Yes |
| Input Labeling |
: Yes |
| OSD Languages |
: Total 17, Indian : 5 (Hindi, Marathi , Bengali , Tamil , Telugu) Subject to updation regularly |
| Subtitle for DivX (Language) |
: 10 Language (English, French, Vietnamese, Russian, Thai, Hebrew, Arab, Korean, Persian, Kudur) |
| Built-in Games |
: Yes |
| BackLight Module |
: Slim LED |
| PMI (Picture Mastering Index) |
: 300 |
| Analog TV Reception |
: Yes |
| Local Key Type |
: Jogstick |
|
| Certified A Grade Panel |
: Yes |
| Zoom |
: Yes |
| Multi Language OSD |
: Yes |
| Sleep Timer |
: Yes |
| Television System |
: PAL BG/DK/I SECAM BG/DK |
|
| General Details |
| Power Supply |
: 100 - 240Vac 50-60Hz |
| Power Consumption (Stand-by) |
: 0.3 watts |
| Set Weight (without stand) |
: 3.3 Kg |
| Set Weight (with stand) |
: 3.5 Kg |
| Set Weight (in Carton) |
: 5.5 Kg |
|
| Power Consumption |
: 40 W |
| Power Consumption Standby |
: 0.5 W |
|
| Supplied Accessories |
|
| Remote Control |
: Yes |
| Batteries |
: Yes |
| Manual |
: Yes |
| Wall Mount |
: Yes |
|
|
Compare LG 24LF454A with:
|
Compare Lloyd L24FBC with:
|
|
|
Key Differences
LG 24LF454A and Lloyd L24FBC differ in resolution (1366 x 768 vs 1920 x 1080), which can affect overall clarity and sharpness of the display. Both TVs provide standard built-in audio performance suitable for regular usage, though external speakers can enhance the experience. Both TVs offer adequate brightness levels suitable for most indoor lighting conditions. LG 24LF454A and Lloyd L24FBC offer different motion rates (NA vs 60 Hz), which can impact smoothness during fast-moving scenes like sports and gaming. Both TVs come with smart platforms that support popular streaming apps and voice control features. Both TVs come in similar screen sizes, making them suitable for comparable viewing setups and room environments. Overall, both models are capable choices in their segment, offering a balance between performance, features, and usability. If you're comparing LG 24LF454A and Lloyd L24FBC, both models come with modern features and are designed to deliver a solid viewing experience across different use cases. Verdict: Both models offer good value, and the better option depends on your specific requirements and viewing preferences.
|
ALERT
