| Model No |
32LH518A |
LEO32HRZS |
| TV Type |
LED TV |
LED TV |
| Screen Size |
32 Inch (80 cm) |
32 Inch (80 cm) |
| Resolution |
1366 x 768 |
1366 x 768 |
| Aspect Ratio |
16:9 |
16:9 |
| Motion Rate |
NA |
NA |
| Viewing Angle |
178° |
178 / 178 degrees |
| USB |
| USB Version |
: 2.0 |
| Supported Audio Formats |
: MP3, AAC, WMA |
| Supported Video Formats |
: MKV, DivX, MP4, AVI, ASF, MOV, FLV, DAT, VOB |
| Supported Picture Formats |
: JPG, JPS, MPO |
|
| USB Version |
: 2.0 & 3.0 |
| Supported Audio Formats |
: MP3, AAC, WMA |
| Supported Video Formats |
: MKV, DivX, MP4, AVI, ASF, MOV, FLV, DAT, VOB |
| Supported Picture Formats |
: JPG |
|
| Video |
| Triple XD Engine |
: Yes |
| Active Noise Reduction |
: Yes |
| Dynamic Color Enhancer |
: Yes |
| IPS Panel |
: Yes |
| Picture Mode |
: 5 modes (Vivid, Standard, Cinema, Cricket, Game) |
|
| Selectable Picture Modes |
: Vivid / Cinema / News / Sports / Normal |
| Video Processing |
: SRV Engine |
| Dynamic contrast ratio |
: 3000000 : 1 |
| Flesh Tone Adjust |
: Off, Low, Medium, High |
| Noise Reduction |
: Off, Low, Medium, High |
| Display Color |
: 16.7 Million |
| Colour System |
: Pal / Secam / Auto |
| Backlight Module |
: EDGE LED |
|
| Audio |
| Dolby Digital Decoder |
: Yes |
| Sound Mode |
: 5 Modes (Standard, Music, Cinema, Cricket, Game) |
| Speaker System |
: 2 Channel Speaker |
| Audio Output (rms) |
: 20 Watts |
| BollyWood Mode |
: Yes |
|
| Audio Output |
: 20 Watts ( 5 Watts X 4) + 30 Watts (15 Watts X 2) |
| Sound Modes |
: Movie, Music, Flat, Normal |
| Equalizer |
: Yes |
|
| Connectivity Options |
| USB |
: 1 (Rear) - You can connect USB Pen Drive or External Hard Drive |
| HDMI™ Connections |
: 1 (Rear) |
| RF In |
: 1 (Rear) |
| Component In (Y,Pb,Pr + Audio) |
: 1 (Composite/Component Common) Rear |
| Composite In (CVBS + Audio) |
: 1 (Rear) |
| Headphone out |
: 1 (RCA Analog Out) |
|
| USB |
: 1 |
| HDMI |
: 2 |
| Composite Video In |
: 1 |
| Component Video (Y/Pb/Pr) In |
: 1 |
| VGA |
: 1 |
| AV Out |
: 1 |
| PC Audio In |
: 1 |
|
| Other Features |
| Motion Eco Sensor |
: Yes |
| Smart Energy Saving |
: Yes |
| Input Labeling |
: Yes |
| OSD Languages |
: Total 17, Indian : 5 (Hindi, Marathi , Bengali , Tamil , Telugu) Subject to updation regularly |
| Built-in Games |
: Yes |
|
| USB Play |
: Movie, Music, Jpeg |
| OSD Languages |
: English / Arabic / Russian |
| Hotel Mode |
: Optional |
| Wake Up Timer |
: Yes |
| Others |
: Alarm |
| Design |
: Black / White |
|
| General Details |
| Power Supply (Voltage, Hz) |
: 100-240Vac, 50-60Hz |
| Power Consumption Standby Mode |
: 0.3 W |
| Set Weight (without stand) |
: 4.8 Kg |
| Set Weight (with stand) |
: 5 Kg |
| Set Weight (in Carton) |
: 6.5 Kg |
|
| Power Supply |
: 100 240VAC ; 50Hz / 60HZ |
| Power Consumption |
: 65 watts |
| Power Consumption (Stand-by) |
: 0.5 Watt |
| Weight with Stand |
: 7.2 Kg |
|
| Supplied Accessories |
| Conventional Remote |
: Yes |
|
| Remote Control |
: Yes |
| Battery Cell |
: Yes |
| Wall Mount |
: Yes |
| Instruction Manual |
: Yes |
| Table Top |
: Yes |
|
|
Compare LG 32LH518A with:
|
Compare Onida LEO32HRZS with:
|
|
|
Key Differences
In general, both TVs cater to modern entertainment needs, including streaming, gaming, and everyday viewing. Both models support 1366 x 768 resolution, ensuring sharp picture quality with detailed visuals for movies, shows, and gaming. Both TVs provide standard built-in audio performance suitable for regular usage, though external speakers can enhance the experience. Both TVs come with smart platforms that support popular streaming apps and voice control features. Both TVs come in similar screen sizes, making them suitable for comparable viewing setups and room environments. Both TVs provide decent motion handling, making them suitable for everyday viewing including sports and action content. Both TVs offer adequate brightness levels suitable for most indoor lighting conditions. Onida LEO32HRZS and LG 32LH518A are well-equipped smart TVs that aim to provide a balance of picture quality, performance, and smart capabilities. Verdict: Both models offer good value, and the better option depends on your specific requirements and viewing preferences.
|