Alert Icon ALERT
Ok Icon
FullSpecs.net Logo
 
Philips 22PFL4758-V7
Rs.14,000.00

Samsung UA23H4003AR
Rs.14,000.00
Model No 22PFL4758-V7 UA23H4003AR
TV Type LED TV LED TV
Screen Size 22 Inch (54.70 cm) 23 Inch (58.42 cm)
Resolution 1920 x 1080 1366 x 768
Aspect Ratio 16:9 16:9
Motion Rate 120 Hz 100 Hz
Viewing Angle 178°/178° NA
USB
USB Version : 2.0
Supported Audio Formats : Mp3
Supported Video Formats : AVI, MP4, MKV, PS, ASF, MOV, MPG, MPEG
Supported Picture Formats : JPEG, BMP, JPE, PNG
USB Version : 2.0
Supported Audio Formats : MP3, AAC, WMA
Supported Video Formats : DivX, MP4, 3GP, AVI, ASF, MKV, MOV, FLV
Supported Picture Formats : JPG
Video
3D Combfilter : Yes
Digital Crystal Clear Plus : Yes
Digital Noise Reduction : Yes
Pixel Precise HD : Yes
Dynamic contrast : 3000000 : 1
Picture Engine : HyperReal Engine
Dynamic Contrast Ratio : Mega DCR
Wide Color Enhancer (Plus) : Yes
Film Mode : Yes
Audio
Output Power ( RMS ) : 6 W
Auto Volume Leveller : Yes
Incredible Surround : Yes
Audio L / R In : Yes
Built-In Speakers : 2
Sound System : Stereo
Dolby MS10 / MS110 : Dolby Digital Plus/Dolby AAC
DTS Studio Sound / DNSe+ : DTS Studio Sound
DTS Premium Sound : DTS 2.0
Auto Volume Leveler : Yes
Sound Output (RMS) : 3 Watt x 2
Speaker Type : Down Firing + Full Range
Connectivity Options
HDMI : 2
USB : 1
Number Of AV : 2
Antenna F-type : Yes
Component Video ( Y Pb Pr ) input : Yes
Composite video ( CVBS ) Input : Yes
PC-In VGA : Yes
HDMI : 1 (Side)
USB : 1 (Side)
Component In (Y/Pb/Pr) : 1 (Rear)
Composite In (AV) : 1 Common Use for Component Y (Rear)
Audio Out (Mini Jack) : 1 (Rear)
RF In (Terrestrial / Cable input) : 1
Other Features
Autostore : Yes
Fine Tuning : Yes
Graphical User Interface : Yes
On Screen Display : Yes
On-Screen Display Languages : English
Digital Clean View : Yes
Auto Channel Search : Yes
Clock&On/Off Timer : Yes
Sleep Timer : Yes
ConnectShare™ (USB 2.0) : Movie
Embeded POP : Yes
OSD Language : English
Triple Protector : Yes
GUI : Single Lite
Design : RHCM
Bezel Type : NNB (12mm)
Panel Tpye : Slim 2
Front Color : Black
Stand Type : Round
DTV Tuner : Ready
Analog Tuner : Yes
Teletext (TTX) : Yes
General Details
Power Supply : 100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
Power Consumption : 45 W
Standby Power Consumption : Less Than 0.5 W
Required Pitch : 100 mm x 100 mm
Product Weight : 2.92 Kg
Product Weight With Stand : 4.07 Kg
Power Supply : AC100 - 240V 50 / 60Hz
Power Consumption (Max) : 32 watts
Power Consumption (Stand-by) : 0.5 watts
Weight without Stand : 2.9 Kg
Weight with Stand : 3 kg
Package Weight : 4.1 Kg
Supplied Accessories
Remote Control : Yes
2 x AAA Batteries : Yes
User Manual : Yes
Power Cord : Yes
Warranty certificate : Yes
Safety / Legal Instructions : Yes
Tabletop Swivel Stand : Yes
Wall Mounting Bracket : Yes
Remote Controller Model : TM1240A
Battery (for Remote Control) : Yes
Power Cable : Yes
User Manual : Yes
Vesa Wall Mount Supported : Yes

Compare Philips 22PFL4758-V7 with:

Compare Samsung UA23H4003AR with:

Key Differences

Both TVs provide standard built-in audio performance suitable for regular usage, though external speakers can enhance the experience. Both TVs offer adequate brightness levels suitable for most indoor lighting conditions. Samsung UA23H4003AR and Philips 22PFL4758-V7 offer different motion rates (100 Hz vs 120 Hz), which can impact smoothness during fast-moving scenes like sports and gaming. Samsung UA23H4003AR features a 23 Inch (58.42 cm) screen while Philips 22PFL4758-V7 comes with 22 Inch (54.70 cm), which can make a noticeable difference depending on your room size and viewing distance. Both TVs come with smart platforms that support popular streaming apps and voice control features. Overall, both models are capable choices in their segment, offering a balance between performance, features, and usability. Samsung UA23H4003AR and Philips 22PFL4758-V7 differ in resolution (1366 x 768 vs 1920 x 1080), which can affect overall clarity and sharpness of the display. If you're comparing Samsung UA23H4003AR and Philips 22PFL4758-V7, both models come with modern features and are designed to deliver a solid viewing experience across different use cases.

Verdict: Both models offer good value, and the better option depends on your specific requirements and viewing preferences.