
![]() Philips TAT1138WT Rs.7,939.00 | ![]() Skullcandy Sesh Evo Rs.7,999.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesSkullcandy Sesh Evo and Philips TAT1138WT are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. Skullcandy Sesh Evo and Philips TAT1138WT offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Ambient vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. There is a noticeable difference in weight (63.5 gm vs 37 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Battery life varies between the two (24 Hours vs 5 + 10 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. From a usability standpoint, both models provide a reliable and premium headphone experience. The frequency response differs (20 Hz - 20000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Skullcandy Sesh Evo uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Philips TAT1138WT supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Impedance levels vary (32 Ohm vs 16 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. The driver size differs between the two (6 mm vs 13 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Verdict: Choosing between Skullcandy Sesh Evo and Philips TAT1138WT depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||