
![]() Sennheiser RS 175-U Rs.21,990.00 | ![]() Skullcandy SESH® ANC Rs.21,999.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesBattery life varies between the two (18 Hours vs ANC On 6 Hours, 26 Hours In Case - ANC Off 7 Hours, 37 Hours In Case.), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. Sennheiser RS 175-U uses Bluetooth NA while Skullcandy SESH® ANC supports Bluetooth 5.2, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. Impedance levels vary (32 ohm vs 32Ω ± 15% Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. There is a noticeable difference in weight (310 gm vs 63.5 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. The frequency response differs (17 Hz - 22000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. The driver size differs between the two (NA vs 12 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active vs Active Noise Cancelling), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Verdict: Choosing between Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||