s

![]() Skullcandy SESH® ANC Rs.21,999.00 | ![]() Sennheiser RS 175-U Rs.21,990.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesThe driver size differs between the two (NA vs 12 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. There is a noticeable difference in weight (310 gm vs 63.5 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active vs Active Noise Cancelling), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Sennheiser RS 175-U uses Bluetooth NA while Skullcandy SESH® ANC supports Bluetooth 5.2, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Battery life varies between the two (18 Hours vs ANC On 6 Hours, 26 Hours In Case - ANC Off 7 Hours, 37 Hours In Case.), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. The frequency response differs (17 Hz - 22000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Impedance levels vary (32 ohm vs 32Ω ± 15% Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. In general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios. If you're comparing Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Verdict: Choosing between Sennheiser RS 175-U and Skullcandy SESH® ANC depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||