Audio Technica BPHS2A vs Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II – Full Comparison & Verdict (2026)

Earpads and headband detach for easy replacement. Carefully crafted using key metal components for lasting durability. Boom-mounted microphone can be positioned on the left or right side. Low-profile, closed-back, on-ear design provides excellent isolation and fit. Low-impedance design delivers high output level from any headphone output. Rigid boom with strong, flexible gooseneck section allows microphone to be adjusted and stay in place. Sleek cardioid condenser microphone with frequency response tailored for clear, articulate vocal reproduction. Proprietary 45 mm large-aperture drivers ( the same used in the ATH-M60xa pro headphones ) with rare earth magnets and copper-clad aluminum wire voice coils.

Made in Germany. Available Variations DT 290 MK II / 80 ohms DT 290 MK II / 250 ohms Flexible, swivelling gooseneck for optimum positioning. Headset with dynamic microphone for broadcast and intercom ( closed ). High-performance neodymium magnet system for excellent playback precision. High-quality dynamic microphone with hypercardioid characteristic ( high feedback prevention ). All versions of the DT 290 are supplied without a connection cable. Please order the desired connection cable at the same time.

Key Differences

Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II and Audio Technica BPHS2A are premium wireless headphones designed to deliver high-quality sound along with advanced features like noise cancellation and long battery life. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. The frequency response differs (10 - 30.000 Hz vs 50Hz - 14KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II and Audio Technica BPHS2A offer different noise cancellation capabilities (NA vs Sound Isolation), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. From a usability standpoint, both models provide a reliable and premium headphone experience. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. There is a noticeable difference in weight (240 g vs 240 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Impedance levels vary (250 ohm vs 38 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. The driver size differs between the two (NA vs 45 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity.

Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.

Top Differences

Noise Cancelling: NA vs Sound Isolation
Driver Size: NA vs 45 mm
Impedance: 250 ohm vs 38 ohm

Compare Audio Technica BPHS2A with:

Compare Beyerdynamic DT 290 MK II with:

Key Differences

Top Differences