Audio Technica BPHS2A vs Beyerdynamic MMX 300 PRO – Key Differences & Best Choice (2026)

Earpads and headband detach for easy replacement. Carefully crafted using key metal components for lasting durability. Boom-mounted microphone can be positioned on the left or right side. Low-profile, closed-back, on-ear design provides excellent isolation and fit. Low-impedance design delivers high output level from any headphone output. Rigid boom with strong, flexible gooseneck section allows microphone to be adjusted and stay in place. Sleek cardioid condenser microphone with frequency response tailored for clear, articulate vocal reproduction. Proprietary 45 mm large-aperture drivers ( the same used in the ATH-M60xa pro headphones ) with rare earth magnets and copper-clad aluminum wire voice coils.

Closed Design. Made in Germany. Soft over-ear pads for high wearing comfort. Professional studio sound with gaming tuning. Maximum comfort for extended gaming sessions. Earpads, headband and cable as replacement parts. Headband pad with a recess in the area of the fontanel. High-quality microphone for excellent intelligibility of speech. Single-sided, detachable cable with an integrated remote control. Unique speech intelligibility thanks to high-quality condenser microphone.

Key Differences

Audio Technica BPHS2A and Beyerdynamic MMX 300 PRO offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Sound Isolation vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Impedance levels vary (38 ohm vs 48 ohm), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Both models support modern Bluetooth connectivity, ensuring stable wireless performance with compatible devices. The frequency response differs (50Hz - 14KHz vs 5Hz - 40KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. In general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios. If you're comparing Audio Technica BPHS2A and Beyerdynamic MMX 300 PRO, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Both headphones are equipped with capable drivers that deliver balanced sound output suitable for music, calls, and entertainment. Both headphones offer solid battery performance, making them suitable for long listening sessions and travel. There is a noticeable difference in weight (240 GM vs 314 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use.

Verdict: Both headphones offer strong performance, and the right choice depends on your priorities such as battery life, comfort, and noise cancellation.

Top Differences

Noise Cancelling: Sound Isolation vs NA
Weight: 240 GM vs 314 GM
Impedance: 38 ohm vs 48 ohm

Compare Audio Technica BPHS2A with:

Compare Beyerdynamic MMX 300 PRO with:

Key Differences

Top Differences