Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Sennheiser RS 175-U – Detailed Specs Comparison (2026)

Closed design. Total battery life up to 38 hours. Six microphones for best speech quality. Customised settings via the beyerdynamic app. Active noise cancellation and transparency mode. Splash-proof according to IP54 certification and sweat resistant. Qi-compatible charging case for wireless charging and fast charging. Wearing detection (automatic playback / stop when inserting / removing the earphones). Multi-point BluetoothÂ® 5.3. for simultaneous connection of multiple BluetoothÂ® devices.

Ergonomic design for enhanced wearing comfort. Listening modes for situational sound customization. Intelligently designed controls for maximum ease of use. Closed, circumaural headphones with excellent digital wireless audio transmission. Exceptional digital audio clarity and transmission range of up to 328ft / 100m ( line of sight ). Enables switching between dynamic bass and virtual surround sound. Supports analog and digital audio inputs and allows toggling between the inputs. Multi-purpose transmitter â€“ also functions as â€˜easy-chargeâ€™ cradle and docking station. Multi-receiver transmission â€“ transmitter supports up to two pairs of headphones simultaneously. 2-year warranty

Key Differences

The driver size differs between the two (NA vs 10 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Sennheiser RS 175-U and Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active vs Active Noise Cancellation), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Sennheiser RS 175-U uses Bluetooth NA while Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Battery life varies between the two (18 Hours vs 10 / 28 / 38 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. Sennheiser RS 175-U and Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. There is a noticeable difference in weight (310 gm vs 51.33 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. The frequency response differs (17 Hz - 22000 Hz vs 20Hz - 40KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. From a usability standpoint, both models provide a reliable and premium headphone experience.

Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features.

Top Differences

Battery Life: 18 Hours vs 10 / 28 / 38 Hours
Driver Size: NA vs 10 mm
Bluetooth: NA vs 5.3
Weight: 310 gm vs 51.33 GM

Compare Beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 with:

Compare Sennheiser RS 175-U with:

Key Differences

Top Differences