
![]() Philips TAT1138BL Rs.7,939.00 | ![]() Skullcandy Method ANC Rs.7,999.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesBattery life varies between the two (6 Hours vs 5 + 10 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. There is a noticeable difference in weight (16.6 gm vs 37 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. The driver size differs between the two (9.2 mm vs 13 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. The frequency response differs (20 Hz - 20000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Skullcandy Method ANC and Philips TAT1138BL offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Impedance levels vary (6 Ohm±15% vs 16 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Skullcandy Method ANC and Philips TAT1138BL are well-known options in the wireless headphone segment, offering a balance of audio quality, battery performance, and smart features. Overall, both headphones are feature-rich and cater to users looking for a combination of sound quality, comfort, and wireless convenience. Skullcandy Method ANC uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Philips TAT1138BL supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. Verdict: Both headphones offer strong performance, and the right choice depends on your priorities such as battery life, comfort, and noise cancellation. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||