
![]() Philips TAT1138BL Rs.7,939.00 | ![]() Skullcandy Sesh Evo Rs.7,999.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesThe driver size differs between the two (6 mm vs 13 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. The frequency response differs (20 Hz - 20000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Skullcandy Sesh Evo uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Philips TAT1138BL supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. If you're comparing Skullcandy Sesh Evo and Philips TAT1138BL, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. There is a noticeable difference in weight (63.5 gm vs 37 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. Skullcandy Sesh Evo and Philips TAT1138BL offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Ambient vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. Impedance levels vary (32 Ohm vs 16 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. Battery life varies between the two (24 Hours vs 5 + 10 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. In general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios. Verdict: Both models are competitive, and your decision should be based on your usage needs and preferred features. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||