s

![]() Skullcandy Method ANC Rs.7,999.00 | ![]() Philips TAT1138BL Rs.7,939.00 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key DifferencesIn general, both options are suitable for everyday use including music, calls, travel, and work-from-home scenarios. Skullcandy Method ANC uses Bluetooth 5.0 while Philips TAT1138BL supports Bluetooth 5.3, which can impact connectivity stability and efficiency. If you're comparing Skullcandy Method ANC and Philips TAT1138BL, both models offer a strong combination of sound performance, comfort, and modern wireless features. Impedance levels vary (6 Ohm±15% vs 16 Ohms), which can affect compatibility and audio output when used with different devices. The driver size differs between the two (9.2 mm vs 13 mm), which can influence sound depth, bass response, and overall audio clarity. Skullcandy Method ANC and Philips TAT1138BL offer different noise cancellation capabilities (Active vs NA), which can impact how effectively they block external noise. There is a noticeable difference in weight (16.6 gm vs 37 GM), which may affect comfort during extended use. The frequency response differs (20 Hz - 20000 Hz vs 20Hz - 20KHz), which can influence how well the headphones reproduce lows, mids, and highs. Battery life varies between the two (6 Hours vs 5 + 10 Hours), which affects how long you can use them on a single charge. Verdict: Choosing between Skullcandy Method ANC and Philips TAT1138BL depends on whether you value better sound, longer battery life, or enhanced features. Top Differences
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| All rights reserved © 2026 FullSpecs.net Developed & maintained by Myzow Solutions, LLP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||